6 Jun 2011

Watch this! Blowjob – Andy Warhol (1964)

Category: Watch this !

I just found that video online. It’s pretty amazing that Andy Warhol did that in 1964!
It’s simple, elegant, erotic and fresh !
You don’t see anything except a man enjoying the moment.
You like?

Dave

20 comments for Watch this! Blowjob – Andy Warhol (1964)

  • Can’t tell if he is really enjoying it or the guy giving is just a bad cocksucker…..Doesn’t show much pleasure to me……

  • i dont like it-we should be able to see the guy sucking too. not too exicting.

  • boring!

  • jeez..come on! What’s great about watching some guy getting a fake blow job!

  • loove andy warholl! this kind of art made him famouss! && all his paintings && other stuff. loove it! =]]

  • Interesting. Very interesting. Terrifically creative, but too long. Got boring. If it wasn’t titled blow job I wouldn’t have known what was happening. Looks more like he’s beating off than getting his dick sucked.

  • Thought this video was kind of dumb, didn’t hardly show anything I wouldn’t buy the video, I probably could of just jerked off in front of my mirror, upgrade please

  • where are the erotic? this is bored!!!

  • Fucking hot! Amazing how much the brain fills in all the rest. LOL Warhol was a genius.

  • Looks more like he was on an acid trip.
    But I watched on my phone at work.
    Im in a better mood now and on big screen.
    Lets see if it does anything for me now.

  • Ok the dark shadows distracted me. I wonder if that was on the film or some anomally covering to digital? i wonder what happened in the middle when it went white?
    and was that him cumming at the end his shoulders hunched and his head went back and his lips quivered.
    then cut to him smoking….

  • Is it just me, or does he look like Thomas Dekker?

  • At least some of you understand it ! It’s art, not porn !
    Dave

  • There’s nothing really revelatory about this film, even if it was made by Andy Warhol in 1964. Warhol indulged in such eccentricities throughout his career, to greater and lesser degrees. What’s amazing is that people still find it interesting!!! Yes, it’s art and was artrageous for it’s time…long before internet porn became as easy to find as the click of a button wherever you happen to be.

  • The guy was not really getting oral sex. it was an act, to get attention. Warhol did like shock and attention, as well as speed pills.

  • Not supposed to be porn; cutting edge for 1964. Pretty interesting.

  • Whether art or porn, the subject did not really seem into it, no enthusiasm or show of deep pleasure, in fact, he seemed fairly disinterested and too conscious of being filmed. Even art should contain something intense in emotion, there was nothing intense about this, no wonder most found it boring.

  • Interesting to read the reactions….
    ranging from disappointment because it isnt the porn they expect…
    to disappointment because the guy’s facial expression
    isn’t just like the ooh and aah in the porns they watch…
    and ofcourse it is boring…
    we all prefer to zap to the best scenes…
    “i wouldn’t buy the video must be the one warhol wouldve liked best”
    none of them has any clue what this movie is about….

  • Andy Warhol once said of himself, “I’m the greatest con man that has ever lived ” because he was, he along with Robert Mapplethorpe, Kieth Haring and a few other’s came along just at the right moment, not because they were great talents, but because they were there at just the right moment in history – I know because I was there to.

  • For 1964 this was earth shattering, there was no Internet, there was no porn as you know now. This was the cutting edge from a homophobic society. Don’t compare it to what you see today. It was almost 50 years ago before most of you found it “boring” was even born. I know because I was around.

Leave a comment

Visit us
Link website adam4adam.com
Follow us
Rate this blog
Best Male Blogs - naked men, gay porn, homo culture, queer blogs

PLU Gay Blogs